Jonny Wilkinson: 'I had to be perfect in everyone's eyes. It was so tiring'
It's surprisingly difficult to interview someone who has a black eye and gashes on his nose and neck, especially when you're sitting two feet away from him on a sofa. Jonny Wilkinson, England rugby legend, hasn't been in a fight on the way to the Rosslyn Park rugby ground (we meet in a messy backroom full of balls he has to sign for some unspecified promotional purpose). He got knocked about the night before playing for his new French club Toulon against Connacht, has flown from Ireland to London to spend a day coaching competition winners for his sponsor Volvic, and is heading back to Nice this evening.
We are not going to get long together, which is frustrating because Wilkinson – England's starriest rugby player in the past decade, but also one of its most injury-prone – is just about the most cerebral, intense, self-questioning sportsman I've ever met; as complex as the choreography of his famous place-kicking routine. He looks like a Californian surfer, and there are times when he talks like one too, trying to explain his philosophy of sport and life.
I had intended a softish opening – "You must be knackered after last night's match" – but immediately, in his gentle, earnest, slightly nasal voice, he is telling me why he could never be a rugby commentator in a sporting afterlife that is now not far away. "I'd be the commentator that TV stations would want rid of straightaway – I would be so non-committal with regard to players' performances."
When I ask him to explain why, the Californian surfer-thinker (he dabbles in Buddhism and reads lots of pop philosophy) starts to emerge. "My view of perfection, which was once totally outcome-based, got me into so much trouble," he says. "I spent so much time trying to influence things that couldn't be changed. But now I've retracted it one step into intention, and that's given me the peace of mind to know I'm doing all I can do. And I am comfortable with that view of what it means to be a perfectionist."
We have, rather earlier in the game than I had intended, reached the key to Wilkinson's character. The obsessive who had achieved everything – including scoring the last-minute drop-goal that won England the 2003 World Cup – by the age of 24, yet found it hard to enjoy the success. His reaction to kicking that goal against Australia was more relief than rapture, because he had failed with several other attempts earlier in the final. Rather than celebrating the success, he found himself dwelling on the failure.
This destabilising pursuit of perfection seems to have started young. "When I was growing up, I had a deep fear of things not going right," Wilkinson says, blaming an "overactive mind". That fear of failure and desire to impress others carried over into his career. "There was a time when I needed to be perfect in everyone else's eyes. I needed people to write the right things in the papers. If I was in the cinema and thought people recognised me, I'd try to behave in a way that would make them think I was the best thing in their mind. It was just so tiring."
The interview is beginning to feel like a therapy session. Mr Wilkinson, tell me about your background; where does this desire for perfection come from? Pushy parents? He insists not, describing his upbringing in suburban Surrey as "well supported, normal, happy". His father was a financial adviser, his mother a secretary in his father's company; one elder brother; went to sporty public school nearby; was "blessed in terms of the opportunities I had". Sounds great. What was the problem?
"I just attached so much importance to everything, because in my head I felt that if I didn't get it right, there was an incredible doom looming behind it. It was a case of succeeding at everything, and I guess that came into the rugby."
Whatever the root cause, Wilkinson's unusually fraught fear of failure drove him to become rugby's leading international points scorer of all time. Now, though, he claims he has overcome his obsessionalism, a liberation he attributes to the string of injuries that have dogged him since the 2003 triumph.
"The trick was learning, through all those injuries, to see that everything is impermanent, so if you get used to that now, you'll get more fulfilment out of what you're doing. But it took me a long time to get the point. During those injury periods, I tried to hang on for several years to where I was during the World Cup. I would picture myself with a video of the World Cup final in my pocket, so anyone I spoke to I could say: 'Hey, do you want to come and watch this video?' I wanted to hang on to what people thought of me."
Injury prevented Wilkinson from playing for England for more than three years, an agonising period that, inevitably, led this introverted soul to put more pressure on himself when he returned.
"I'd go into games trying not to make mistakes, and it made life hell. There was no enjoyment in anything. If it went well it was a relief; if it went badly it was crisis time. Now, though, I don't try to live up to those expectations." These days, Wilkinson says, only he is the judge of how he is playing and what he wants out of his career, not other people. The therapy is paying off.
"I'm working out what I really want, both as a player and a person," he says. "I still haven't got quite what I'm searching for, but I know roughly what it is. When I was younger, all I wanted to do was drop the goal that won the World Cup. At the age of eight, I wrote down that that was what I wanted to do. But I came to realise it wasn't enough, so my life's become more about internal fulfilment than an external tick in a box, or a cup to hold up, or a player of the year award. I came to understand my real self and then use rugby as a way to express that, rather than using rugby as a method of trying to succeed in life."
Wilkinson is now a veteran and has appeared in two World Cup finals – he shook off injury long enough to play in the 2007 World Cup in France – yet is only 31 this month. He first played for England at the age of 18 – an early elevation which led him to turn down a place at Durham University – and has won 78 caps, plus six for the British Lions. But he might have close to double that number, had it not been for all those injuries. "I've been around for ever," he says, "but not necessarily on the field."
His career has had a bizarre shape. Fame and glory in the first five years (in 2003, Wilkinson was named BBC Sports Personality of the Year; he and David Beckham appeared together in an advert for Adidas, with Jonny the hero and Beckham as stooge; and rugby briefly appeared to be challenging football for popularity); mostly pain and frustration since. But naturally, Jonny the philosopher offers a more positive – if slightly convoluted – spin on his rugby career.
"It seems chaotic, but when you look at it, it falls into place. Having that rise to 2003, then to be hit by an immediate injury in the game afterwards, and then to have a string of five or six years' worth of injuries, some of them so far-fetched that you realised it was too random to be random . . . That made me realise there was a point, which was to get a better balance in life. The injuries forced me to deal with the identity-loss of not playing rugby, and to ask myself: 'Who are you if you're not playing rugby?' Everything you've built is about how people see you, but that's not who you are."
Last year, Wilkinson left his long-time club Newcastle Falcons (he had joined their academy as a teenager) for wealthy and ambitious Toulon. The deal was reported to be worth €700,000 a year, but he insists the move wasn't about money.
"I'd played about 25 games [for Newcastle] in six seasons, and it seemed as if there was a negative cycle there that I had to break free from. Maybe it was self-fulfilling, in terms of deep down what I might have been feeling. I couldn't get on the field; I didn't feel I was paying anything back to Newcastle any more; I felt I was hindering them. So I decided to give it a go in France. I was attracted by the beauty of so many new experiences – new team, new language, new region, living like that. I'd been in a comfort zone at Newcastle – it was all I'd ever known – and I realised it was the time in my life to push myself."
I suggest he probably finds French easier to understand than Geordie. "I really struggled with the Newcastle dialect when I went up there," he admits with a laugh. "I felt terrible because I kept asking people to repeat themselves. In France, at least I have an excuse for it."
His girlfriend, Shelley Jenkins, has moved to France with him, they're committed to learning the language, and he says they're loving French life. The rugby's going well, too. Despite the black eye and the gashes, he's in good shape, tanned and with the bulging muscularity that underlines his reputation as a fierce tackler. Traditionally, players who occupy his position – fly-half, the playmaker, the hinge of the team, akin to the quarterback in American football – are the artists, feeding off the hard slog of the artisans in the forwards, but Wilkinson has always relished the physical confrontation. It is one reason why his career has been so injury-plagued.
This season has, though, been less satisfactory internationally; he was dropped by England after a series of ineffectual performances. "It's been a turbulent time," Wilkinson admits. "There were so many things going through my head."
He says he couldn't understand why he was missing simple kicks, and was having trouble dealing with that in the course of the game. "When everything's flowing, you don't have to apply any real thought to it. But it's a very different thing when something's not quite there when you expect it to be. It's hard to make corrections under pressure."
This does not sound like a man who has entirely shaken free the demons of self-doubt. How, then, did it feel to be dropped from the England side he had formerly inspired to such heights?
"It's happened to me before. I'd given everything I could and you can't cheat in that kind of environment." So he deserved the chop? "I always think that in my next game, at my best, I can do anything, but I wouldn't say it was a huge surprise. I accepted that it was time for someone else to have a go."
What did his manager, the World Cup-winning captain Martin Johnson, say – take a rest? "Yeah," he responds quickly, "take a long, long rest." He stresses each of those "longs", and laughs, to emphasise this is not quite how the conversation went.
Then he surprises me. You would think getting back into the England team – especially with the next World Cup taking place in 2011 – would be crucial to him. Wilkinson says not. "My priority is not necessarily to say: 'I've got to win my place back.' There's a bigger plan to all this, which is to get the best from myself. That's more important than anything, and if I feel like I'm achieving that, and England never appears again for me, I'd rather go out that way." Wilkinson wants control of the judging process – not Johnson, the pundits, the fans, nor the people who spot him at the cinema.
Finally, the inevitable question for a sportsman on the wrong side of 30, in the most physically demanding of sports: when will he pack it in?
"There's going to come a point where you think: 'I've had enough,'" he says. "I'll feel that when, one, I don't feel I have any more to give; or two, I feel like I've given enough and don't want to give any more. I'm never going to be happy to close the book on rugby, but I need to know that when I do, I won't be one of those guys that says: 'I could have done that.' I'm waiting for the eureka moment that hits me, and makes me understand I've had enough."
dilluns, 10 de maig del 2010
Humano, demasiado Humano
Etiquetes de comentaris:
The Guardian,
Top 14
dijous, 6 de maig del 2010
Lucha por la cuarta plaza de la Magners.
Munster, Cardiff Blues y Edinbugh luchan por la cuarta plaza de la Magners League, las otras tres ya están decididas, Leinster, Ospreys y Warriors. Una última jornada apasionante, con el duelo en tierras galesas de los Blues ante Munster.
Who's in the race for Magners League glory?
With just one round of action left before the inaugural Magners League Play Offs, we thought we'd try and explain all the possible semi-final scenarios prior to this weekend's games.It can appear pretty complicated but we've tried our best to give you every possible scenario and to make things as simple as we can.
Here's the score…
Four teams will qualify for the Magners League semi-finals.
The top team teams will each receive a home semi-final.
First will play fourth and second will play third.
Positions are decided on league points. If two or more teams finish on equal league points, then the number of wins becomes the deciding factor. If they are still equal, points difference comes into play.
As things stand, three teams have already qualified for the Play-Offs. They are Leinster, Ospreys and Glasgow Warriors.
No team is yet guaranteed a home semi-final.
There are three teams still in with a shout of the last remaining Play-Off place. They are Munster, Cardiff Blues and Edinburgh.
Leinster will secure top spot if they avoid defeat to Edinburgh at the RDS on Sunday night. The lowest Leinster can finish is third if both the Ospreys and Glasgow pick up bonus-point wins and Leinster slip to defeat by more than seven points.
The Ospreys will be guaranteed a home semi-final if they gain a maximum-point win over the Dragons at the Liberty Stadium on Friday. If they fail to do this, they could be overtaken by Glasgow. The lowest the Ospreys can finish is fourth, with Glasgow and Munster both able to overtake them.
Two match points at the Scarlets would secure third place for Glasgow. A bonus-point win would be enough to claim a home semi if the Ospreys fail to pick up maximum points. A straight win would also be enough if the Ospreys lose or draw with the Dragons.
This is where it gets complicated…
Munster know that anything other than defeat at the Blues would secure a top-four finish, as would a losing bonus point and a try scoring bonus point. A single losing bonus-point would also be enough for fourth spot if the Blues fail to score four tries and Edinburgh don't pick up a bonus-point win at Leinster and overturn a current points deficit of 35. Munster's points difference is currently plus 38, while Edinburgh's is just plus three.
Munster could yet secure a home semi-final depending on results involving the Ospreys and Glasgow. To overtake Glasgow, Munster must win and hope that the Warriors lose. If Glasgow draw with the Scarlets and fail to score four tries, then Munster will need a bonus-point win or they will need to overturn a points deficit of 26. Glasgow's points difference is currently 64.
Munster can overtake the Ospreys if they gain a maximum point win over the Blues and the Ospreys take just a point from their clash with the Dragons. If the Ospreys pick up two match points, Munster can still move ahead of them if they secure a maximum-point win and overturn a points deficit of 16. The Ospreys' points difference is currently plus 54.
A win will be enough for Munster if the Ospreys fail to pick up any points, while they would need to overturn that points deficit if they were to win and the Ospreys were to pick up a single point as both teams would be level on league points and number of wins.
The highest Munster can finish is second. The lowest they can end up is seventh.
Phew. Now on to the Blues.
Cardiff Blues need a bonus-point win over Munster to guarantee a Play-Off Place. A win of any sorts would be enough if they prevent Munster from picking up a match point and if Edinburgh fail to win with a bonus point at Leinster.
The highest the Blues can finish is fourth. They have no chance of a home semi-final. The lowest they can finish is seventh.
Edinburgh must beat Leinster in Dublin with a bonus-point to have any chance of progressing. They must then hope that the Blues beat Munster without a bonus point. If that is the case, then Edinburgh would qualify for the Play-Offs providing Munster don't pick up any match points. If Munster pick up a single losing bonus point, then Edinburgh must overturn a points deficit of 35.
Like the Blues, the highest Edinburgh can finish is fourth. They cannot gain a home semi. The lowest they can finish is seventh.
Told you it was complicated!
Fortunately, things will get a lot simpler after this weekend.
For a look at the Magners League table as it stand, click here
To read the Magners League rules on how teams are ranked, click here
Who's in the race for Magners League glory?
With just one round of action left before the inaugural Magners League Play Offs, we thought we'd try and explain all the possible semi-final scenarios prior to this weekend's games.It can appear pretty complicated but we've tried our best to give you every possible scenario and to make things as simple as we can.
Here's the score…
Four teams will qualify for the Magners League semi-finals.
The top team teams will each receive a home semi-final.
First will play fourth and second will play third.
Positions are decided on league points. If two or more teams finish on equal league points, then the number of wins becomes the deciding factor. If they are still equal, points difference comes into play.
As things stand, three teams have already qualified for the Play-Offs. They are Leinster, Ospreys and Glasgow Warriors.
No team is yet guaranteed a home semi-final.
There are three teams still in with a shout of the last remaining Play-Off place. They are Munster, Cardiff Blues and Edinburgh.
Leinster will secure top spot if they avoid defeat to Edinburgh at the RDS on Sunday night. The lowest Leinster can finish is third if both the Ospreys and Glasgow pick up bonus-point wins and Leinster slip to defeat by more than seven points.
The Ospreys will be guaranteed a home semi-final if they gain a maximum-point win over the Dragons at the Liberty Stadium on Friday. If they fail to do this, they could be overtaken by Glasgow. The lowest the Ospreys can finish is fourth, with Glasgow and Munster both able to overtake them.
Two match points at the Scarlets would secure third place for Glasgow. A bonus-point win would be enough to claim a home semi if the Ospreys fail to pick up maximum points. A straight win would also be enough if the Ospreys lose or draw with the Dragons.
This is where it gets complicated…
Munster know that anything other than defeat at the Blues would secure a top-four finish, as would a losing bonus point and a try scoring bonus point. A single losing bonus-point would also be enough for fourth spot if the Blues fail to score four tries and Edinburgh don't pick up a bonus-point win at Leinster and overturn a current points deficit of 35. Munster's points difference is currently plus 38, while Edinburgh's is just plus three.
Munster could yet secure a home semi-final depending on results involving the Ospreys and Glasgow. To overtake Glasgow, Munster must win and hope that the Warriors lose. If Glasgow draw with the Scarlets and fail to score four tries, then Munster will need a bonus-point win or they will need to overturn a points deficit of 26. Glasgow's points difference is currently 64.
Munster can overtake the Ospreys if they gain a maximum point win over the Blues and the Ospreys take just a point from their clash with the Dragons. If the Ospreys pick up two match points, Munster can still move ahead of them if they secure a maximum-point win and overturn a points deficit of 16. The Ospreys' points difference is currently plus 54.
A win will be enough for Munster if the Ospreys fail to pick up any points, while they would need to overturn that points deficit if they were to win and the Ospreys were to pick up a single point as both teams would be level on league points and number of wins.
The highest Munster can finish is second. The lowest they can end up is seventh.
Phew. Now on to the Blues.
Cardiff Blues need a bonus-point win over Munster to guarantee a Play-Off Place. A win of any sorts would be enough if they prevent Munster from picking up a match point and if Edinburgh fail to win with a bonus point at Leinster.
The highest the Blues can finish is fourth. They have no chance of a home semi-final. The lowest they can finish is seventh.
Edinburgh must beat Leinster in Dublin with a bonus-point to have any chance of progressing. They must then hope that the Blues beat Munster without a bonus point. If that is the case, then Edinburgh would qualify for the Play-Offs providing Munster don't pick up any match points. If Munster pick up a single losing bonus point, then Edinburgh must overturn a points deficit of 35.
Like the Blues, the highest Edinburgh can finish is fourth. They cannot gain a home semi. The lowest they can finish is seventh.
Told you it was complicated!
Fortunately, things will get a lot simpler after this weekend.
For a look at the Magners League table as it stand, click here
To read the Magners League rules on how teams are ranked, click here
dimarts, 4 de maig del 2010
Tolouse vs Biarritz, final de la Heineken Cup
Los franceses se han llevado las dos plazas de la final, en unas semifinales más flojas que los cuartos nuestros vecinos consiguieron las dos victorias. Este año el rugby francés ha llegado a la cima, el Seis Naciones, la Heineken, el Toulon en la final de la European Club, el día 23 de mayo en Marsella.
Heineken Cup wins of Toulouse and Biarritz are a triumph for total rugby
The successes of Toulouse and Biarritz against Leinster and Munster respectively were based squarely on their efforts up front, but that was far from the whole story. In any event the question must also be put: so what? If teams are able to apply huge physical force and no little skill in the forward exchanges, why should this be deemed inferior to the skills shown by players whose athletic bent is fleetness of foot?
In truth, the distinct impression from the two semi-finals was that the French teams could have played pretty much as they liked and would still have won. There was no discernible lack of effort from either of the Irish provincial sides, though Munster have not played as poorly as they did on Sunday for some time, but they were bested in the set pieces after being competitive early on.
Though the scoreboard registered that Leinster and Munster were within touching distance for what seemed an unnaturally long time, given the dominance of the French, they were nevertheless always chasing the game in terms of producing something that had the hallmark of present-day Irish rugby. That is to say anything with momentum, involving successive phases of quick ball, that prevents an opposing defence reorganising and which exposes mismatches which can be exploited.
All too often the ball that was moved by the Irish teams was done so behind the gain line and into a defence that was square on and still in situ. This is the problem when you cannot get good first-phase ball, the manoeuvring of opponents is made that much more difficult because they do not have to turn at any point.
The French, unlike most of the rest of the world, probably barring the South Africans and Argentines, have never subscribed to the notion that the scrum is only a way of restarting the game. Now that there appears some official movement around the issue of crooked feeds and collapsed scrums their national and club teams are rightly poised to reap the rewards of keeping the faith.
In both semi-finals the scrum was a focal point of aggression and it was so because of the psychological damage caused to the opposing forwards when they are physically beaten and driven backwards. Not only does it make an opponent's job more difficult in terms of having to run longer lines to get involved at the breakdown, it holds his manhood open to ridicule – and publicly so.
If you think that this is being a tad melodramatic you should take another look at the reaction of poor Cian Healy, who was taken off by Leinster coach Michael Cheika after just 30 minutes. The mortification writ large as he watched Springbok prop CJ van der Linde take his place was as excruciating as it was interesting.
Healy may well in his defence cite a differentiation in the way referee Nigel Owens ruled over the scrums. Owens rightly stopped Leinster pushing before the ball came in when it was the Toulouse put-in. This contributed hugely to the stability of the scrums. However, the standard Toulouse put-in did not come until after their pack had started to drive and, having gained momentum, they simply walked over the ball that was fed by the excellent Byron Kelleher, the scrum-half.
Leinster always had to react to the drive as Toulouse knew when they would start, so it meant that the Irish pack were going backwards, and they continued to do so. This does not explain the extent of the French side's dominance and Toulouse were comfortably the better team, but it is something to which referees and coaches should pay attention.
At least Leinster posed some form of threat out in the backs when they did get decent ball. Munster's backs were as shell-shocked as their forwards and on numerous occasions they forgot occasions one of the absolute laws of rugby: when you are in the ----, do not pass the ball back and make it worse.
When they tried to fashion the impossible out of the improbable they ended up giving the Biarritz scrum-half Dimitri Yachvili a kickable penalty and he needed no second invitation to keep hammering home his forwards' dominance.
So, these were not classic matches in the accepted sense, but they were for those able to understand the degree of expertise that is needed to fashion wins in this way.
One further thing to say about both the French winners this weekend is that they have proved on their way to the final that should they need to satisfy the cultural snobs of rugby, they can do that as well and with something to spare.
Heineken Cup wins of Toulouse and Biarritz are a triumph for total rugby
The successes of Toulouse and Biarritz against Leinster and Munster respectively were based squarely on their efforts up front, but that was far from the whole story. In any event the question must also be put: so what? If teams are able to apply huge physical force and no little skill in the forward exchanges, why should this be deemed inferior to the skills shown by players whose athletic bent is fleetness of foot?
In truth, the distinct impression from the two semi-finals was that the French teams could have played pretty much as they liked and would still have won. There was no discernible lack of effort from either of the Irish provincial sides, though Munster have not played as poorly as they did on Sunday for some time, but they were bested in the set pieces after being competitive early on.
Though the scoreboard registered that Leinster and Munster were within touching distance for what seemed an unnaturally long time, given the dominance of the French, they were nevertheless always chasing the game in terms of producing something that had the hallmark of present-day Irish rugby. That is to say anything with momentum, involving successive phases of quick ball, that prevents an opposing defence reorganising and which exposes mismatches which can be exploited.
All too often the ball that was moved by the Irish teams was done so behind the gain line and into a defence that was square on and still in situ. This is the problem when you cannot get good first-phase ball, the manoeuvring of opponents is made that much more difficult because they do not have to turn at any point.
The French, unlike most of the rest of the world, probably barring the South Africans and Argentines, have never subscribed to the notion that the scrum is only a way of restarting the game. Now that there appears some official movement around the issue of crooked feeds and collapsed scrums their national and club teams are rightly poised to reap the rewards of keeping the faith.
In both semi-finals the scrum was a focal point of aggression and it was so because of the psychological damage caused to the opposing forwards when they are physically beaten and driven backwards. Not only does it make an opponent's job more difficult in terms of having to run longer lines to get involved at the breakdown, it holds his manhood open to ridicule – and publicly so.
If you think that this is being a tad melodramatic you should take another look at the reaction of poor Cian Healy, who was taken off by Leinster coach Michael Cheika after just 30 minutes. The mortification writ large as he watched Springbok prop CJ van der Linde take his place was as excruciating as it was interesting.
Healy may well in his defence cite a differentiation in the way referee Nigel Owens ruled over the scrums. Owens rightly stopped Leinster pushing before the ball came in when it was the Toulouse put-in. This contributed hugely to the stability of the scrums. However, the standard Toulouse put-in did not come until after their pack had started to drive and, having gained momentum, they simply walked over the ball that was fed by the excellent Byron Kelleher, the scrum-half.
Leinster always had to react to the drive as Toulouse knew when they would start, so it meant that the Irish pack were going backwards, and they continued to do so. This does not explain the extent of the French side's dominance and Toulouse were comfortably the better team, but it is something to which referees and coaches should pay attention.
At least Leinster posed some form of threat out in the backs when they did get decent ball. Munster's backs were as shell-shocked as their forwards and on numerous occasions they forgot occasions one of the absolute laws of rugby: when you are in the ----, do not pass the ball back and make it worse.
When they tried to fashion the impossible out of the improbable they ended up giving the Biarritz scrum-half Dimitri Yachvili a kickable penalty and he needed no second invitation to keep hammering home his forwards' dominance.
So, these were not classic matches in the accepted sense, but they were for those able to understand the degree of expertise that is needed to fashion wins in this way.
One further thing to say about both the French winners this weekend is that they have proved on their way to the final that should they need to satisfy the cultural snobs of rugby, they can do that as well and with something to spare.
Etiquetes de comentaris:
Daily Telegraph,
Heineken Cup
Subscriure's a:
Missatges (Atom)